
I'm starting to sound like my grandfather these days. In a world of computer generated images, special effects, and 3D, I find myself saying more and more, "they don't make em' like they used to." Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey is a perfect example of classic filmmaking, and what you can do with a vision, a message, and no CGI.

Story: Kubrick developed the screenplay with famed sci-fi author Arthur C. Clarke simultaneously with Clarke's book. The story does not aim low in its scope and in it's message about space, evolution, and mankind's thought. Kubrick & Clarke bring the idea of how man's thought evolved and formed, which was helped by alien intelligence. The opening sequence (The Dawn of Man) is one of the finest scenes in cinema with zero dialogue and only action bringing the story forward. The greatest achievement about Kubrick & Clarke is that they don't hold back on what they want to say about the world and about evolution. I find that some people don't enjoy 2001, but I believe that is mostly due to how intellectually challenging it is. There are no explosions, no aliens battles, just grand ideas about humankind and our place in this universe. I can't say many filmmakers have the balls or intelligence to try and tackle such an important & widened scope of our world, species, & our universe.

Over forty years later, Kubricks 2001: A Space Odyssey still astounds audiences & filmmakers all over the world. It remains a timeless classic in sci-fi, and in film history. Without using CGI or even blue screen you have some of the most realistic, and revolutionary, special effects in film (which one Kubrick his only Oscar in his career). I think 2001: A Space Odyssey will forever remain a classic, will make audiences expand their minds, and will astound filmmakers for decades and centuries to come. It is without a doubt, a crowning achievement in filmmaking and one of the many peaks of Stanley Kubrick's phenomenal career.

Interesting stuff. Nice images; however, you break from the template you created (and disappoint your viewers as such) by not including "acting" as an area of consideration. Even if it isn't appropriate here, you could mention that.
ReplyDeleteFurther, it remains difficult to tease out these "areas" of consideration. What with your black background and absence of (true) headings...
Make it easier for the skimmers, please.
Also, you were shy a post this week, I believe.